Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Abaqus and nTop 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (46.9% of reviews)
Small-Business (60.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Abaqus
Star Rating
(50)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (46.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about AbaqusnTop
Star Rating
(11)4.8 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (60.0% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about nTopSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Abaqus excels in finite element analysis with a score of 8.8, while nTop shines in fluid analysis, scoring 8.2. Reviewers mention that Abaqus provides robust capabilities for complex simulations, making it a preferred choice for detailed engineering tasks.
- Reviewers mention that nTop offers superior ease of use with a score of 8.9 compared to Abaqus's 7.5. Users on G2 highlight nTop's intuitive interface and streamlined workflows, which significantly reduce the learning curve for new users.
- G2 users report that Abaqus has a strong quality of support, scoring 8.1, but nTop stands out with a perfect score of 10.0. Reviewers say that nTop's customer service is highly responsive and helpful, which enhances the overall user experience.
- Users say that Abaqus has a more extensive range of 3D/solid modeling tools, scoring 6.4, while nTop's tools are rated lower. Reviewers mention that this makes Abaqus a better option for users needing comprehensive modeling capabilities.
- Reviewers mention that nTop has a higher product direction score of 10.0, indicating a strong positive outlook for future updates and features, while Abaqus scores 7.4. Users on G2 appreciate nTop's commitment to innovation and user feedback in its development process.
- Users report that Abaqus has a larger total number of reviews (49) compared to nTop (11), suggesting a more established user base. However, reviewers mention that nTop's higher star rating of 4.8 indicates a strong satisfaction level among its users despite fewer reviews.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Abaqus
No pricing availablenTop
No pricing availableFree Trial
Abaqus
No trial information availablenTop
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.6
37
9.4
6
Ease of Use
7.5
38
8.9
6
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.1
35
10.0
5
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
7.4
36
10.0
6
Features by Category
File Support - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
File Editing - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Software Integrations - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Software Type - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Building Preparation - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Design
6.4
18
Not enough data
6.6
18
Not enough data
6.5
19
Not enough data
7.0
16
Not enough data
Tools
8.2
14
Not enough data
8.8
22
Not enough data
8.1
16
Not enough data
Work
7.9
15
Not enough data
8.1
13
Not enough data
8.4
18
Not enough data
8.0
14
Not enough data
8.0
11
Not enough data
Environment
7.0
15
Not enough data
8.3
12
Not enough data
8.5
13
Not enough data
8.6
18
Not enough data
Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)Hide 18 FeaturesShow 18 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Tools - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
File Options - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Customization - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Environment - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Abaqus and nTop are categorized as Simulation & CAE
Unique Categories
Abaqus has no unique categories
nTop is categorized as Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD) and Additive Manufacturing
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Abaqus
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
nTop
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Higher Education
20.4%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
16.3%
Automotive
16.3%
Aviation & Aerospace
12.2%
Research
10.2%
Other
24.5%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
50.0%
Consumer Goods
20.0%
Medical Devices
10.0%
Design
10.0%
Airlines/Aviation
10.0%
Other
0.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
Abaqus has no discussions with answers
nTop has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
