Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Abaqus and Modelica 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (46.9% of reviews)
Small-Business (52.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Abaqus
Star Rating
(50)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (46.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about AbaqusModelica
Star Rating
(21)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (52.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about ModelicaSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Modelica excels in drawing tools, scoring 8.6, which reviewers mention allows for intuitive and detailed modeling, while Abaqus falls short with a score of 6.6, indicating less user-friendly drawing capabilities.
- Reviewers mention that Modelica's fluid analysis capabilities are impressive, scoring 8.9, as users appreciate its robust simulation features, whereas Abaqus, with a score of 8.2, is seen as less effective in this area.
- Users on G2 highlight that Modelica offers superior editing tools, scoring 8.1, which reviewers say enhances productivity, while Abaqus's score of 6.5 suggests limitations in its editing functionalities.
- Reviewers mention that Abaqus shines in finite element analysis with a score of 8.8, as users report it provides comprehensive and accurate simulations, contrasting with Modelica's lower score of 6.3 in this domain.
- G2 users note that Modelica has a slight edge in ease of use, scoring 8.2, which reviewers say makes it more accessible for new users compared to Abaqus's score of 7.5, indicating a steeper learning curve.
- Users report that both products perform equally well in multibody dynamics, each scoring 8.1, but reviewers mention that Modelica's overall integration with other tools enhances its usability in this area.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Abaqus
No pricing availableModelica
No pricing availableFree Trial
Abaqus
No trial information availableModelica
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.6
37
8.5
12
Ease of Use
7.5
38
8.2
12
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.1
35
7.6
9
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
7.4
36
7.9
11
Features by Category
Design
6.4
18
Not enough data
6.6
18
8.6
7
6.5
19
8.1
7
7.0
16
Not enough data
Tools
8.2
14
8.9
6
8.8
22
6.3
5
8.1
16
8.1
6
Work
7.9
15
8.5
9
8.1
13
8.0
10
8.4
18
8.6
7
8.0
14
Not enough data
8.0
11
Not enough data
Environment
7.0
15
8.3
5
8.3
12
Not enough data
8.5
13
Not enough data
8.6
18
8.9
9
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Abaqus and Modelica are categorized as Simulation & CAE
Unique Categories
Abaqus has no unique categories
Modelica has no unique categories
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Abaqus
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Modelica
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Higher Education
20.4%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
16.3%
Automotive
16.3%
Aviation & Aerospace
12.2%
Research
10.2%
Other
24.5%
Automotive
21.1%
Renewables & Environment
15.8%
Research
10.5%
Higher Education
10.5%
Oil & Energy
5.3%
Other
36.8%
Alternatives
Discussions
Abaqus has no discussions with answers
Modelica has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
