Users report that Inventor Nastran excels in finite element analysis with a score of 8.8, while Abaqus also performs well in this area but has a slightly lower score, indicating that Inventor Nastran may offer more robust features for complex simulations.
Reviewers mention that Abaqus shines in quality of support, scoring 8.1 compared to Inventor Nastran's 6.7. This suggests that users may find more reliable assistance and resources when using Abaqus.
G2 users highlight that Inventor Nastran's 3D/solid modeling tools score 6.4, which may limit its effectiveness for users needing advanced modeling capabilities, whereas Abaqus does not provide a specific score for this feature but is generally regarded as more versatile in handling complex geometries.
Users on G2 indicate that Inventor Nastran has a higher score in discrete event modeling (7.9) compared to Abaqus, suggesting that it may be better suited for users focused on event-driven simulations.
Reviewers say that Abaqus has a slight edge in ease of use with a score of 7.5, compared to Inventor Nastran's 7.1, which may make it more appealing for new users or those less experienced with simulation software.
Users report that Inventor Nastran's command clarity scores 8.6, indicating a more intuitive interface for executing commands, while Abaqus does not have a specific score for this feature, which could impact user experience negatively.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Abaqus
No pricing available
Inventor Nastran
No pricing available
Free Trial
Abaqus
No trial information available
Inventor Nastran
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
37
7.5
22
Ease of Use
7.5
38
7.1
22
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.1
35
6.6
22
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.