Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Abaqus and GNU Octave 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (46.9% of reviews)
Small-Business (66.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Abaqus
Star Rating
(50)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (46.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about AbaqusGNU Octave
Star Rating
(55)4.2 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (66.0% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about GNU OctaveSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that GNU Octave excels in its 3D/solid modeling tools, receiving a stellar rating of 9.5, while Abaqus falls short with a rating of 6.4, making Octave a preferred choice for those needing robust modeling capabilities.
- Reviewers mention that GNU Octave's ease of use is rated at 8.4, significantly higher than Abaqus's 7.5, indicating that Octave is more user-friendly, especially for beginners or small businesses.
- G2 users highlight that GNU Octave's data visualization capabilities are rated at 8.9, showcasing its strength in presenting complex data effectively, whereas Abaqus's visualization tools do not match this level of performance.
- Users on G2 report that GNU Octave offers superior support for ANOVA with a rating of 8.8, while Abaqus does not provide the same level of statistical analysis support, making Octave a better option for users focused on statistical modeling.
- Reviewers mention that GNU Octave's command clarity is rated at 9.0, which enhances the user experience by making it easier to understand and execute commands, compared to Abaqus's rating of 8.6.
- Users say that while both products support fluid analysis, GNU Octave's rating of 8.5 indicates a more comprehensive approach, whereas Abaqus's rating of 8.2 suggests it may not be as robust in this area.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Abaqus
No pricing availableGNU Octave
No pricing availableFree Trial
Abaqus
No trial information availableGNU Octave
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.6
37
8.3
43
Ease of Use
7.5
38
8.4
43
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.1
35
8.2
39
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
7.4
36
7.7
41
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
8.4
17
Not enough data
8.2
20
Not enough data
8.0
18
Capabilities
Not enough data
8.9
20
Not enough data
8.0
18
Not enough data
8.1
17
Not enough data
8.5
16
Methodology
Not enough data
8.8
13
Not enough data
8.3
19
Not enough data
8.3
16
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Design
6.4
18
9.5
10
6.6
18
8.3
11
6.5
19
8.2
10
7.0
16
8.2
10
Tools
8.2
14
8.5
11
8.8
22
8.3
11
8.1
16
8.2
10
Work
7.9
15
9.0
10
8.1
13
7.9
11
8.4
18
8.2
11
8.0
14
8.8
11
8.0
11
8.0
11
Environment
7.0
15
8.7
10
8.3
12
8.5
11
8.5
13
8.3
10
8.6
18
9.0
10
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Abaqus
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
GNU Octave
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Higher Education
20.4%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
16.3%
Automotive
16.3%
Aviation & Aerospace
12.2%
Research
10.2%
Other
24.5%
Research
11.3%
Computer Software
11.3%
Information Technology and Services
5.7%
Higher Education
5.7%
Food Production
5.7%
Other
60.4%
Discussions
Abaqus has no discussions with answers
GNU Octave has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
