Compare Abaqus and Designcenter Solid Edge 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (46.2% of reviews)
Small-Business (53.9% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Starting at $90.47 Per Month
Abaqus
Star Rating
(53)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (46.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about AbaqusDesigncenter Solid Edge
Star Rating
(581)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (53.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Starting at $90.47 Per Month
Free Trial is available
Browse all 4 pricing plansSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Designcenter Solid Edge excels in user-friendliness, making it particularly suitable for beginners. Users appreciate its straightforward UI and intuitive design, which allows newcomers to quickly pick up the software and start working effectively.
- Users say that Designcenter Solid Edge significantly enhances workflow efficiency by allowing easy reuse of standard parts. This feature is highlighted as a time-saver, especially for repeat projects, as it enables users to grab the right components without disrupting their creative flow.
- According to verified reviews, Abaqus is praised for its robust simulation capabilities, particularly in providing accurate results. Users commend its extensive material library and strong solvers, which allow for detailed adjustments and non-linear simulations, making it a powerful tool for complex analyses.
- Reviewers mention that while Designcenter Solid Edge has a higher overall satisfaction score, Abaqus holds its own in specific technical areas, such as finite element analysis. Users appreciate the depth of features available in Abaqus, although they note that it may not be as accessible for those new to simulation software.
- G2 reviewers highlight that Designcenter Solid Edge has a more active user community, as evidenced by its recent influx of reviews. This suggests a vibrant user base that can provide support and share insights, which is beneficial for those looking to learn and grow within the software.
- Users express that while both products have their strengths, Designcenter Solid Edge's ease of use and setup make it a more attractive option for small businesses and those just starting in CAD, whereas Abaqus may appeal more to users with advanced simulation needs who require detailed technical documentation and support.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Abaqus
No pricing availableDesigncenter Solid Edge
Solid Edge Design and Drafting XaaS
Starting at $90.47
Per Month
Get started quickly with part & assembly design, automated drawings, basic animation and rendering.
- 2D drafting
- Data import and reuse
- Basic 3D part design
Free Trial
Abaqus
No trial information availableDesigncenter Solid Edge
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
40
8.4
423
Ease of Use
7.6
41
8.3
463
Ease of Setup
9.3
7
8.2
248
Ease of Admin
7.8
6
8.4
90
Quality of Support
8.2
38
8.2
393
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.9
6
8.8
88
Product Direction (% positive)
7.6
39
8.3
412
Features by Category
CAD to CAM
Not enough data
8.6
99
Not enough data
8.4
93
Not enough data
8.4
94
CNC Programming
Not enough data
7.9
84
Not enough data
8.0
82
Not enough data
8.1
81
Machining
Not enough data
8.2
92
Not enough data
8.1
92
Not enough data
8.4
91
Design
Not enough data
8.9
178
Not enough data
9.0
180
Not enough data
8.7
174
Not enough data
8.2
167
Edit
Not enough data
8.5
172
Not enough data
8.3
162
Not enough data
8.5
171
Not enough data
8.4
163
Collaboration
Not enough data
8.5
166
Not enough data
8.7
171
Not enough data
8.2
166
File Support - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
8.7
84
Not enough data
8.2
66
Not enough data
8.2
74
File Editing - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
7.7
74
Not enough data
8.5
78
Software Integrations - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
7.6
64
Not enough data
8.6
81
Software Type - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.4
72
Generative AI - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
6.0
26
Not enough data
6.0
26
Building Preparation - Additive Manufacturing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Design
6.4
19
8.6
96
6.6
18
8.6
96
6.5
19
8.5
94
7.0
16
7.9
94
Tools
8.2
14
7.6
80
8.9
25
8.0
86
8.1
16
7.7
82
Work
7.9
15
7.8
83
8.1
13
7.7
83
8.5
19
7.8
83
8.0
14
7.7
77
8.0
11
8.1
83
Environment
7.0
15
8.1
89
8.3
12
8.0
90
8.5
13
7.9
85
8.6
19
8.5
91
Tools - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
8.5
101
Not enough data
7.7
93
Not enough data
8.4
96
Not enough data
8.3
93
Not enough data
7.4
90
File Options - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
8.1
94
Not enough data
8.2
93
Not enough data
7.8
94
Not enough data
7.4
90
Not enough data
7.5
96
Customization - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
7.9
90
Not enough data
7.4
88
Not enough data
7.6
90
Not enough data
7.6
96
Environment - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
7.8
93
Not enough data
7.9
90
Not enough data
7.6
90
Not enough data
7.9
100
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Abaqus and Designcenter Solid Edge are categorized as Simulation & CAE
Unique Categories
Abaqus has no unique categories
Designcenter Solid Edge is categorized as Additive Manufacturing, Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAM), Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD), and General-Purpose CAD
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Abaqus
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Designcenter Solid Edge
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Higher Education
19.2%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
17.3%
Automotive
15.4%
Aviation & Aerospace
11.5%
Research
9.6%
Other
26.9%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
21.1%
Automotive
12.7%
Design
9.0%
Machinery
5.9%
Electrical/Electronic Manufacturing
3.9%
Other
47.5%
Alternatives
Discussions
Abaqus has no discussions with answers
Is Solidworks or Solid Edge better?
4 Comments
HJ
Solidworks is far better in terms of productivity and user friendly mostly for repetitive models or library parts. Read more
How can solid edge be improved? Making it available for the higher version of the OS.
2 Comments
EK
Hello Mahalakshmi,
The most recent version, Solid Edge 2021, has been certified to run on the Windows 10 Enterprise or Professional (64-bit only) version...Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
