Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare Abaqus and Creo Elements/Direct Modeling 
Featured Products
Sponsored
You’re seeing this ad based on the product’s relevance to this page. Sponsored content does not receive preferential treatment in any of G2’s ratings.
CMS IntelliCAD
Visit Website
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (46.9% of reviews)
Small-Business (52.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
Abaqus
Star Rating
(50)4.3 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (46.9% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about AbaqusCreo Elements/Direct Modeling
Star Rating
(22)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (52.4% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about Creo Elements/Direct ModelingSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- Users report that Creo Elements/Direct Modeling excels in its 3D/solid modeling tools, with a score of 6.4, making it a preferred choice for small businesses looking for robust modeling capabilities. In contrast, Abaqus shines in finite element analysis with a score of 8.8, which reviewers mention is crucial for complex simulations.
- Reviewers mention that the drawing tools in Creo Elements/Direct Modeling, scoring 6.6, are user-friendly but may lack some advanced features found in Abaqus, which offers superior fluid analysis capabilities with a score of 8.2, making it more suitable for users focused on fluid dynamics.
- G2 users highlight that the rendering tools in Creo Elements/Direct Modeling, with a score of 7.0, provide decent visualizations, but Abaqus outperforms in mechanical event simulation, scoring 8.4, which users say is essential for accurate modeling of physical behaviors.
- Users on G2 report that the customization options in Creo Elements/Direct Modeling, particularly in custom commands and scripts, are beneficial for tailoring workflows, while Abaqus offers a more robust environment for managing multiple profiles, scoring 8.5, which reviewers mention enhances user efficiency.
- Reviewers mention that the quality of support for Creo Elements/Direct Modeling, scoring 7.2, could be improved, whereas Abaqus has a higher support rating of 8.1, indicating a more reliable assistance experience for users facing challenges.
- Users say that while both products cater to small businesses, Creo Elements/Direct Modeling has a slightly lower ease of use rating at 7.9 compared to Abaqus's 7.5, suggesting that users may find Abaqus more intuitive despite its advanced features.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Abaqus
No pricing availableCreo Elements/Direct Modeling
No pricing availableFree Trial
Abaqus
No trial information availableCreo Elements/Direct Modeling
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.6
37
8.3
21
Ease of Use
7.5
38
7.9
21
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.1
35
7.2
19
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
Not enough data
Not enough data
Product Direction (% positive)
7.4
36
8.9
21
Features by Category
Design
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Edit
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Collaboration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Design
6.4
18
Not enough data
6.6
18
Not enough data
6.5
19
Not enough data
7.0
16
Not enough data
Tools
8.2
14
Not enough data
8.8
22
Not enough data
8.1
16
Not enough data
Work
7.9
15
Not enough data
8.1
13
Not enough data
8.4
18
Not enough data
8.0
14
Not enough data
8.0
11
Not enough data
Environment
7.0
15
Not enough data
8.3
12
Not enough data
8.5
13
Not enough data
8.6
18
Not enough data
Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)Hide 18 FeaturesShow 18 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Tools - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
File Options - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Customization - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Environment - Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Abaqus and Creo Elements/Direct Modeling are categorized as Simulation & CAE
Unique Categories
Abaqus has no unique categories
Creo Elements/Direct Modeling is categorized as Mechanical Computer-aided Design (MCAD) and General-Purpose CAD
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Abaqus
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Creo Elements/Direct Modeling
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Higher Education
20.4%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
16.3%
Automotive
16.3%
Aviation & Aerospace
12.2%
Research
10.2%
Other
24.5%
Mechanical or Industrial Engineering
42.9%
Design
19.0%
Higher Education
9.5%
Shipbuilding
4.8%
Oil & Energy
4.8%
Other
19.0%
Alternatives
Discussions
Abaqus has no discussions with answers
Creo Elements/Direct Modeling has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
