Users report that Abaqus excels in finite element analysis with a score of 8.8, while Ansys Sherlock received a lower score of 7.7, indicating that Abaqus may provide more robust capabilities for complex simulations.
Reviewers mention that Ansys Sherlock offers superior editing tools, scoring 7.5 compared to Abaqus's 6.5, which suggests that users may find it easier to modify and refine their models in Ansys Sherlock.
G2 users highlight that Abaqus has a strong performance in mechanical event simulation with a score of 8.4, whereas Ansys Sherlock scored 7.7, indicating that Abaqus may be more effective for users focused on simulating mechanical interactions.
Users on G2 note that Ansys Sherlock provides better hardware support with a score of 7.8 compared to Abaqus's 7.0, suggesting that Ansys Sherlock may be more compatible with a wider range of systems and configurations.
Reviewers say that Abaqus shines in its command clarity, scoring 8.6, while Ansys Sherlock scored 7.6, indicating that users may find Abaqus's interface and command structure more intuitive and easier to navigate.
Users report that both products have their strengths in task management, with Abaqus scoring 8.3 and Ansys Sherlock at 7.5, but Abaqus may offer a more streamlined experience for managing multiple profiles effectively.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Abaqus
No pricing available
Ansys Sherlock
No pricing available
Free Trial
Abaqus
No trial information available
Ansys Sherlock
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
37
8.4
19
Ease of Use
7.5
38
8.2
20
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.1
35
8.6
19
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.