Users report that Ansys HFSS excels in "Finite Element Analysis" with a score of 9.1, while Abaqus follows closely with a score of 8.8, indicating that Ansys HFSS may provide more robust capabilities for users focused on electromagnetic simulations.
Reviewers mention that Ansys HFSS offers superior "3D/Solid Modeling Tools" with a score of 7.5 compared to Abaqus's 6.4, suggesting that users may find Ansys HFSS more effective for complex 3D designs.
G2 users highlight that the "Quality of Support" for Ansys HFSS is rated at 8.5, which is higher than Abaqus's 8.1, indicating that users may experience better assistance and resources when using Ansys HFSS.
Users on G2 report that Ansys HFSS has a more user-friendly interface, reflected in its "Ease of Use" score of 8.5 compared to Abaqus's 7.5, making it a more accessible option for new users.
Reviewers mention that both products perform well in "Fluid Analysis," with Ansys HFSS scoring 8.3 and Abaqus at 8.2, showing that users can expect solid performance in this area from either software.
Users say that Ansys HFSS's "Customization" options, particularly in "Custom Commands," are more flexible, allowing for tailored workflows, which can enhance productivity compared to the more rigid customization options in Abaqus.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Abaqus
No pricing available
Ansys HFSS
No pricing available
Free Trial
Abaqus
No trial information available
Ansys HFSS
No trial information available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.6
37
9.1
32
Ease of Use
7.5
38
8.6
32
Ease of Setup
Not enough data
Not enough data
Ease of Admin
Not enough data
Not enough data
Quality of Support
8.1
35
8.6
28
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.