Introducing G2.ai, the future of software buying.Try now
Compare AbacusLaw by CARET and Filevine 
Featured Products
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (94.6% of reviews)
Small-Business (74.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
No pricing available
AbacusLaw by CARET
Star Rating
(114)4.0 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (94.6% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Not enough data
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about AbacusLaw by CARETFilevine
Star Rating
(276)4.7 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (74.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about FilevineSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Filevine excels in overall user satisfaction, boasting a significantly higher G2 Score compared to AbacusLaw by CARET. This indicates that users find Filevine to be a more reliable and effective solution for legal case management.
- Users say that Filevine's recent updates, including features like Demands AI, have streamlined the legal representation process, making tasks that once took days much quicker. In contrast, AbacusLaw users appreciate its integration with MS Outlook, which allows for easy tagging and attachment of emails to specific cases, but it lacks the same level of innovation.
- Reviewers mention that Filevine's user interface, while packed with information, can feel dense and overwhelming at times. This contrasts with AbacusLaw's straightforward approach, where users highlight the ease of storing and retrieving client information as a time-saving feature.
- According to verified reviews, Filevine shines in its ease of use and setup, with users rating it highly for its intuitive design. Meanwhile, AbacusLaw, while functional, has received mixed feedback regarding its usability, suggesting that some users may face challenges in navigating the software effectively.
- Users highlight that Filevine's reporting and document management capabilities are robust, with many finding it easier to locate documents and navigate through the system. AbacusLaw, on the other hand, offers solid document management features but does not match the level of sophistication found in Filevine.
- Reviewers note that while both products have their strengths, Filevine's overall support quality and product direction are rated higher, indicating a more proactive approach to user needs and future enhancements. AbacusLaw users appreciate its accounting module integration but feel it could benefit from more frequent updates and improvements.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
AbacusLaw by CARET
No pricing availableFilevine
No pricing availableFree Trial
AbacusLaw by CARET
No trial information availableFilevine
Free Trial is available
Ratings
Meets Requirements
8.1
85
9.2
243
Ease of Use
7.7
82
9.3
251
Ease of Setup
7.5
18
8.1
141
Ease of Admin
8.5
21
8.8
70
Quality of Support
7.8
75
9.0
233
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
8.2
20
8.9
68
Product Direction (% positive)
6.3
84
9.6
243
Features by Category
Law
8.5
19
Not enough data
8.8
17
Not enough data
8.4
16
Not enough data
Report
8.0
22
Not enough data
8.3
20
Not enough data
7.8
16
Not enough data
Logistics
8.0
23
Not enough data
8.1
26
Not enough data
8.8
28
Not enough data
Platform Basics
7.6
39
8.9
198
7.2
47
9.2
202
8.1
34
9.1
183
6.3
32
8.8
195
Content Management
7.8
51
9.2
198
8.0
50
8.2
192
7.4
49
9.0
200
Agentic AI - Legal Case Management
Not enough data
5.3
5
Not enough data
7.3
5
Not enough data
5.3
5
Not enough data
5.0
5
Not enough data
3.7
5
Not enough data
3.7
5
Platform Basics
7.4
26
8.8
20
7.5
28
8.1
20
8.3
26
8.1
18
6.2
26
8.8
20
8.1
31
8.9
20
Content Management
7.7
34
8.7
19
7.5
34
8.0
19
7.3
29
8.6
18
Time & Billing
7.9
25
6.4
17
7.7
17
6.4
16
7.8
21
5.9
16
Agentic AI - Legal Practice Management
Not enough data
5.7
5
Not enough data
5.7
5
Not enough data
6.0
5
Not enough data
6.0
5
Not enough data
6.0
5
Not enough data
6.0
5
Not enough data
6.0
5
Platform Content
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform Additional Functionality
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform Data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Enterprise Legal Management (ELM)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Case Management - Immigration
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Practice Management - Immigration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
9.3
5
Not enough data
Not enough data
Storage and Collaboration - Legal Document Management
Not enough data
8.7
54
Not enough data
9.3
54
Not enough data
9.0
54
Not enough data
9.2
54
Document Management - Legal Document Management
Not enough data
9.2
54
Not enough data
9.0
54
Not enough data
8.9
54
Analysis - Legal Document Management
Not enough data
8.3
54
Not enough data
8.1
54
Artificial Intelligence - Legal Document Management
Not enough data
7.0
52
Accessibility - Legal Document Management
Not enough data
8.6
54
Agentic AI - Legal Document Management
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI - AI Legal Assistant
Not enough data
8.5
26
Not enough data
8.5
25
LLM and NLP - AI Legal Assistant
Not enough data
8.5
26
Technology Benefit - AI Legal Assistant
Not enough data
8.6
26
Not enough data
8.5
25
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Consistency, Accuracy and Efficiency - AI Legal Assistant
Not enough data
8.5
25
Automation using Legal Tech - AI Legal Assistant
Not enough data
8.4
25
Compliance and Data Security - AI Legal Assistant
Not enough data
8.7
25
Ease of Use and Adaptability - AI Legal Assistant
Not enough data
8.5
25
Agentic AI - AI Legal Assistant
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Legal Billing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
AbacusLaw by CARET and Filevine are categorized as Legal Billing, Legal Case Management, and Legal Practice Management
Unique Categories
AbacusLaw by CARET is categorized as Conflict Check
Filevine is categorized as AI Legal Assistant, Legal Document Management, Immigration, and Enterprise Legal Management (ELM)
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
AbacusLaw by CARET
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Filevine
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Law Practice
54.1%
Legal Services
36.0%
Insurance
1.8%
Government Administration
1.8%
Real Estate
0.9%
Other
5.4%
Legal Services
55.5%
Law Practice
43.1%
Medical Practice
0.4%
Judiciary
0.4%
Facilities Services
0.4%
Other
0.4%
Discussions
How do you use AbacusLaw where transactions involve multiple currencies.
1 Comment
CW
We do not use different currencies at our firm. However, I would convert each currency received to the default currency used by your firm, and include a...Read more
AbacusLaw by CARET has no more discussions with answers
Does Filevine have an app?
2 Comments
SJ
I have not came across the app. I have created a bookmark in chrome browser and created a shortcut in Mobile home screen. Read more
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
