Users report that 3DPrinterOS excels in its cloud-based platform, offering seamless access from anywhere, while OctoPrint, being a downloadable application, requires local setup which some users find less convenient.
Reviewers mention that OctoPrint has a higher ease of use rating (9.4) compared to 3DPrinterOS (7.7), indicating that users find OctoPrint more intuitive for everyday tasks.
G2 users highlight that 3DPrinterOS provides robust file support, particularly for STL files (9.1), while OctoPrint also performs well but slightly edges out with a score of 9.3, showcasing its reliability in handling various file types.
Users on G2 report that 3DPrinterOS shines in its integrated 3D modeling capabilities, which are not as strong in OctoPrint, making it a better choice for those needing comprehensive design tools.
Reviewers say that the quality of support for 3DPrinterOS is rated at 8.5, which is slightly higher than OctoPrint's 8.1, suggesting that users may find more responsive assistance with 3DPrinterOS.
Users report that 3DPrinterOS has a strong product direction score (7.9), indicating a positive outlook for future updates, while OctoPrint's score of 8.7 suggests it is also well-regarded for ongoing development, but with a slightly more favorable perception among its users.
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.