G2 takes pride in showing unbiased reviews on user satisfaction in our ratings and reports. We do not allow paid placements in any of our ratings, rankings, or reports. Learn about our scoring methodologies.
A weekly snapshot of rising stars, new launches, and what everyone's buzzing about.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users value the real-time code quality checks of SonarQube, enhancing their development processes effectively.
Users appreciate the real-time code quality checks of SonarQube, enhancing collaboration and efficiency in code management.
Users value the easy integrations of SonarQube with existing projects and CI/CD pipelines, enhancing their workflow significantly.
Users find that SonarQube has software bugs that occasionally lead to vague errors and complicate code analysis.
Users find SonarQube expensive, especially given the lack of support and complications during setup and operation.
Users find the complex configuration of SonarQube challenging and time-consuming, particularly for newcomers.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users appreciate the easy integrations with various tools in OpenText Static Application Security Testing, enhancing workflow efficiency.
Users value the extensive integration capabilities of OpenText Static Application Security Testing with various third-party tools.
Users value the extensive integration support of OpenText Static Application Security Testing with various third-party tools.
Users are frustrated by false positives, though they can ignore issues to improve future scan results.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users value the new security dashboard and vulnerability management for providing vital insights and metrics.
Users appreciate the integrated automation of Codacy, finding it easy to use for maintaining clean code.
Users value the integrated automation testing of Codacy for its ease of use and effective quality enforcement.
Users find Codacy to be expensive at $19/month, which may be prohibitive for smaller organizations.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users appreciate the responsive and helpful customer support of Checkmarx, ensuring assistance when needed.
Users find Checkmarx to be very user-friendly, easily navigating its numerous features and functionalities.
Users find easy integrations with Checkmarx, enabling quick adaptation to its numerous features and scanning tools.
Users find the dashboard layout and display confusing, making navigation less intuitive and more challenging.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users appreciate the accuracy of results from Kiuwan, valuing its user-friendly interface and effective reporting capabilities.
Users appreciate the accuracy of findings from Kiuwan, leading to high satisfaction with code scans and reports.
Users praise the wonderful customer support of Kiuwan, appreciating their effective assistance and user-friendly experience.
This description is provided by the seller.
This description is provided by the seller.
Pros and Cons are compiled from review feedback and grouped into themes to provide an easy-to-understand summary of user reviews.
Users value the comprehensive security analysis of Veracode, enabling effective identification and remediation of vulnerabilities.
Users value the effective vulnerability detection of Veracode, which enhances security and streamlines the development process.
Users value the comprehensive solutions offered by Veracode, effectively enhancing application security and streamlining development.
Users find the platform expensive, with rising costs and hard-to-justify licensing for each application request.
Users express concerns over the complex licensing issues and discrepancies between promises and actual delivery of features.
Users face pricing issues, including complex licensing models and escalating costs without justifiable value.
Fortify on Demand (FoD) is a complete Application Security as a Service solution. It offers an easy way to get started with the flexibility to scale. In addition to static and dynamic, Fortify on Dema
DeepSource is an all-in-one code health platform that equips organizations with everything they need to build maintainable and secure software while elevating the velocity of their software developmen
Automate your code reviews and write faster code with Codiga Coding Assistant. Codiga proposes two products: 1. Automated Code Reviews on GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket 2. Smart Coding Assistant to h
GuardRails is an end-to-end security platform that makes AppSec easier for both security and development teams. We scan, detect, and provide real-time guidance to fix vulnerabilities early. Trusted b
Codecov is a code coverage tool.
codebeat is an automated review for web and mobile that gathers the results of static code analysis into a single, real-time report that gives all project stakeholders the information required to iden
Platform for detecting security vulnerabilities in applications by analyzing the source code. bugScout® is the most complete and versatile SAST platform on the market for detecting application securi
Seamless GitHub integration