# Best Enterprise Peer Code Review Software

  *By [Adam Crivello](https://research.g2.com/insights/author/adam-crivello)*

   Products classified in the overall Peer Code Review category are similar in many regards and help companies of all sizes solve their business problems. However, enterprise business features, pricing, setup, and installation differ from businesses of other sizes, which is why we match buyers to the right Enterprise Business Peer Code Review to fit their needs. Compare product ratings based on reviews from enterprise users or connect with one of G2's buying advisors to find the right solutions within the Enterprise Business Peer Code Review category.

In addition to qualifying for inclusion in the Peer Code Review Software category, to qualify for inclusion in the Enterprise Business Peer Code Review Software category, a product must have at least 10 reviews left by a reviewer from an enterprise business.





## Category Overview

**Total Products under this Category:** 61


## Trust & Credibility Stats

**Why You Can Trust G2's Software Rankings:**

- 30 Analysts and Data Experts
- 5,200+ Authentic Reviews
- 61+ Products
- Unbiased Rankings

G2's software rankings are built on verified user reviews, rigorous moderation, and a consistent research methodology maintained by a team of analysts and data experts. Each product is measured using the same transparent criteria, with no paid placement or vendor influence. While reviews reflect real user experiences, which can be subjective, they offer valuable insight into how software performs in the hands of professionals. Together, these inputs power the G2 Score, a standardized way to compare tools within every category.



---

**Sponsored**

### Octopus Deploy

Octopus Deploy sets the standard for Continuous Delivery (CD), empowering software teams to deliver value in an agile way. Globally, more than 4,000 organizations rely on our Continuous Delivery, GitOps, and release orchestration solutions to deliver swift value to their customers. At Octopus, we create happy deployments, and by extension, happy software teams. Founded in 2012, our vision is for all software teams to look forward to deployment time; to be excited about seeing their changes deployed and used by their customers. We want them to deploy more and more frequently, and to feel 100% confident it will just work. Octopus efficiently orchestrates software delivery across multi-cloud, Kubernetes, data centers, and hybrid environments, whether containerized modern apps or heritage applications. With governance, risk, and compliance (GRC) at its core, Octopus supports Platform Engineering teams in their mission to provide a superior developer experience (DevEx). Octopus also actively contributes to the developer community with open-source projects. - Effortless scaling - Deploy consistently, quickly, and without duplicating effort to thousands of locations or customers. Tenants let you use one deployment process for thousands of customers. See all your deployments at a glance on a single dashboard. - Faster deployments - Deploy faster and more frequently to thousands of application hosts. Use one deployment process consistently across environments. Reduce time between build and deployment by automatically promoting releases. Use the deployment strategy that works for you, like rolling, blue/green, or canary. - Reduce risk - Reduce deployment failure rate and mean time to recovery with automation built-in. Step timeouts and retries reduce manual intervention, while guided failure mode lets you keep deployments moving when needed. Our Insights feature reveals your DevOps performance and areas that need attention based on the 4 key DORA metrics. - Improve DevEx - Simple deployments empower teams and let developers focus on building new features. Create processes easily with our friendly UI and over 500 step templates, or use command lines and scripts. Runbooks automate routine and emergency operations tasks, freeing your teams for more crucial work. - Increase security - Built-in, flexible features to manage your security and compliance requirements. Use role-based access control (RBAC) to limit what users can do in Octopus. Configure ITSM approvals and OpenID Connect with popular providers for secure, compliant deployments. Handle complex software delivery at any scale with Octopus Deploy.



[Try for Free](https://www.g2.com/external_clickthroughs/record?secure%5Bad_program%5D=ppc&secure%5Bad_slot%5D=category_product_list&secure%5Bcategory_id%5D=563&secure%5Bdisplayable_resource_id%5D=536&secure%5Bdisplayable_resource_type%5D=Category&secure%5Bmedium%5D=sponsored&secure%5Bplacement_reason%5D=neighbor_category&secure%5Bplacement_resource_ids%5D%5B%5D=311&secure%5Bprioritized%5D=false&secure%5Bproduct_id%5D=6646&secure%5Bresource_id%5D=563&secure%5Bresource_type%5D=Category&secure%5Bsource_type%5D=category_page&secure%5Bsource_url%5D=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.g2.com%2Fcategories%2Fpeer-code-review%2Fenterprise&secure%5Btoken%5D=7d0e7f0f475e6df3e03f73827f45a030fbc6815a28391c1392213f48c6f25b8b&secure%5Burl%5D=https%3A%2F%2Foctopus.com%2Ffree%3Futm_source%3Dg2%26utm_medium%3Dpaid-display%26utm_campaign%3Dglobal-032026-g2-clicks%26utm_content%3Dfree-tier%26utm_term%3D&secure%5Burl_type%5D=free_trial)

---

## Top-Rated Products (Ranked by G2 Score)
  ### 1. [GitHub](https://www.g2.com/products/github/reviews)
  GitHub is where the world builds software. Millions of individuals, organizations and businesses around the world use GitHub to discover, share, and contribute software. Developers at startups to Fortune 50 companies use GitHub, every step of the way.


  **Average Rating:** 4.7/5.0
  **Total Reviews:** 2,260

**User Satisfaction Scores:**

- **Quality of Support:** 8.7/10 (Category avg: 8.5/10)
- **Ease of Use:** 8.7/10 (Category avg: 8.8/10)


**Seller Details:**

- **Seller:** [GitHub](https://www.g2.com/sellers/github)
- **Year Founded:** 2008
- **HQ Location:** San Francisco, CA
- **Twitter:** @github (2,638,213 Twitter followers)
- **LinkedIn® Page:** https://www.linkedin.com/company/1418841/ (6,000 employees on LinkedIn®)

**Reviewer Demographics:**
  - **Who Uses This:** Software Engineer, Senior Software Engineer
  - **Top Industries:** Computer Software, Information Technology and Services
  - **Company Size:** 46% Small-Business, 31% Mid-Market


#### Pros & Cons

**Pros:**

- Features (123 reviews)
- Ease of Use (110 reviews)
- Team Collaboration (109 reviews)
- Collaboration (107 reviews)
- Version Control (102 reviews)

**Cons:**

- Complexity (47 reviews)
- Learning Curve (45 reviews)
- Difficulty for Beginners (43 reviews)
- Learning Difficulty (41 reviews)
- Steep Learning Curve (36 reviews)

  ### 2. [Bitbucket](https://www.g2.com/products/bitbucket/reviews)
  Bitbucket is the Git solution for professional teams. It provides collaboration and code management around the versioning of your codebase. Every piece of core functionality has been built to help software teams work better together. This ranges from collaboration to integrations & extensibility, security, and scalability. Bitbucket allows software teams to collaborate around their source code, secure their code base, enforce development workflows, and scale as their team grows. It integrates with JIRA Software for traceability from feature ideation through deployment. Bitbucket provides a platform for developers to discuss code changes, a window into development progress for development managers, and a performant version control system for system admins.


  **Average Rating:** 4.4/5.0
  **Total Reviews:** 973

**User Satisfaction Scores:**

- **Quality of Support:** 8.5/10 (Category avg: 8.5/10)
- **Ease of Use:** 8.7/10 (Category avg: 8.8/10)


**Seller Details:**

- **Seller:** [Atlassian](https://www.g2.com/sellers/atlassian)
- **Year Founded:** 2002
- **HQ Location:** Sydney and San Francisco
- **Twitter:** @Atlassian (106,006 Twitter followers)
- **LinkedIn® Page:** https://www.linkedin.com/company/atlassian (21,797 employees on LinkedIn®)
- **Ownership:** NASDAQ:TEAM

**Reviewer Demographics:**
  - **Who Uses This:** Software Engineer, Senior Software Engineer
  - **Top Industries:** Computer Software, Information Technology and Services
  - **Company Size:** 40% Small-Business, 32% Mid-Market


#### Pros & Cons

**Pros:**

- Jira Integration (25 reviews)
- Code Review (17 reviews)
- Ease of Use (14 reviews)
- Git Integration (14 reviews)
- CD Integration (13 reviews)

**Cons:**

- Slow Speed (16 reviews)
- Lack of Features (9 reviews)
- UX Improvement (9 reviews)
- Performance Issues (8 reviews)
- Improvement Needed (7 reviews)

  ### 3. [GitLab](https://www.g2.com/products/gitlab/reviews)
  GitLab is the most comprehensive AI-Powered DevSecOps platform that enables software innovation by empowering development, security, and operations teams to build better software, faster. With GitLab, teams can create, deliver, and manage code quickly and continuously instead of managing disparate tools and scripts. GitLab helps your teams across the complete DevSecOps lifecycle, from developing, securing, and deploying software. What makes us truly different? - Flexibility: Consume as a service or manage your own deployment - Cloud-Agnostic: Deploy anywhere with no vendor lock-in - No rip and replace: Scale to a platform approach at your own pace


  **Average Rating:** 4.5/5.0
  **Total Reviews:** 869

**User Satisfaction Scores:**

- **Quality of Support:** 8.5/10 (Category avg: 8.5/10)
- **Ease of Use:** 8.7/10 (Category avg: 8.8/10)


**Seller Details:**

- **Seller:** [GitLab Inc.](https://www.g2.com/sellers/gitlab-inc)
- **Company Website:** https://about.gitlab.com/
- **Year Founded:** 2014
- **HQ Location:** San Francisco, California
- **Twitter:** @gitlab (170,735 Twitter followers)
- **LinkedIn® Page:** https://www.linkedin.com/company/5101804/ (3,357 employees on LinkedIn®)

**Reviewer Demographics:**
  - **Who Uses This:** Software Engineer, Senior Software Engineer
  - **Top Industries:** Computer Software, Information Technology and Services
  - **Company Size:** 38% Mid-Market, 37% Small-Business


#### Pros & Cons

**Pros:**

- Ease of Use (43 reviews)
- Features (42 reviews)
- CI (36 reviews)
- CD Integration (34 reviews)
- Integrations (34 reviews)

**Cons:**

- Complexity (21 reviews)
- Difficult Learning (19 reviews)
- Confusing Interface (16 reviews)
- Complex User Interface (15 reviews)
- Learning Curve (13 reviews)

  ### 4. [Azure DevOps Server](https://www.g2.com/products/azure-devops-server/reviews)
  Azure DevOps Server, formerly known as Team Foundation Server (TFS), is a comprehensive on-premises solution developed by Microsoft for managing the entire application lifecycle. It integrates version control, project management, build automation, testing, and release management into a unified platform, facilitating collaboration among development teams. Designed to support both agile and waterfall methodologies, Azure DevOps Server enables organizations to plan, develop, test, and deliver software efficiently within their own infrastructure. Key Features and Functionality: - Version Control: Offers robust source code management through Team Foundation Version Control (TFVC) and Git, allowing teams to choose between centralized or distributed version control systems. - Project Management: Provides agile planning tools, including configurable Kanban boards and backlogs, to plan, track, and discuss work across teams. - Build Automation: Enables continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) pipelines to build, test, and deploy applications across various platforms and environments. - Testing: Includes manual and exploratory testing tools to ensure code quality and support the entire testing lifecycle. - Release Management: Facilitates controlled and automated deployment of applications to different environments, ensuring consistent and reliable releases. - Extensibility: Supports integration with various development environments, including Microsoft Visual Studio and Eclipse, and offers APIs for custom extensions. Primary Value and User Benefits: Azure DevOps Server addresses the challenges of managing complex software development projects by providing a centralized platform that enhances collaboration, streamlines workflows, and improves code quality. By integrating various development tools and processes, it reduces the overhead associated with managing multiple disparate systems. Organizations benefit from increased transparency, better project tracking, and faster delivery times, all while maintaining control over their data within their own infrastructure. This makes Azure DevOps Server particularly valuable for enterprises with strict compliance requirements or those operating in environments where cloud-based solutions are not feasible.


  **Average Rating:** 4.2/5.0
  **Total Reviews:** 191

**User Satisfaction Scores:**

- **Quality of Support:** 8.2/10 (Category avg: 8.5/10)
- **Ease of Use:** 7.9/10 (Category avg: 8.8/10)


**Seller Details:**

- **Seller:** [Microsoft](https://www.g2.com/sellers/microsoft)
- **Year Founded:** 1975
- **HQ Location:** Redmond, Washington
- **Twitter:** @microsoft (13,105,844 Twitter followers)
- **LinkedIn® Page:** https://www.linkedin.com/company/microsoft/ (227,697 employees on LinkedIn®)
- **Ownership:** MSFT

**Reviewer Demographics:**
  - **Who Uses This:** Software Engineer, Senior Software Engineer
  - **Top Industries:** Information Technology and Services, Computer Software
  - **Company Size:** 41% Enterprise, 39% Mid-Market


#### Pros & Cons

**Pros:**

- Automation (2 reviews)
- Collaboration (2 reviews)
- Convenience (2 reviews)
- Customer Support (2 reviews)
- Deployment (2 reviews)

**Cons:**

- Complex Setup (2 reviews)
- Difficulty (2 reviews)
- Complexity (1 reviews)
- Complex Management (1 reviews)
- Difficult Configuration (1 reviews)

  ### 5. [Crucible](https://www.g2.com/products/crucible/reviews)
  Review code, discuss changes, share knowledge, and identify defects across SVN, Git, Mercurial, CVS, and Perforce.


  **Average Rating:** 3.9/5.0
  **Total Reviews:** 27

**User Satisfaction Scores:**

- **Quality of Support:** 7.1/10 (Category avg: 8.5/10)
- **Ease of Use:** 8.2/10 (Category avg: 8.8/10)


**Seller Details:**

- **Seller:** [Atlassian](https://www.g2.com/sellers/atlassian)
- **Year Founded:** 2002
- **HQ Location:** Sydney and San Francisco
- **Twitter:** @Atlassian (106,006 Twitter followers)
- **LinkedIn® Page:** https://www.linkedin.com/company/atlassian (21,797 employees on LinkedIn®)
- **Ownership:** NASDAQ:TEAM

**Reviewer Demographics:**
  - **Who Uses This:** Software Engineer
  - **Top Industries:** Information Technology and Services, Computer Software
  - **Company Size:** 68% Enterprise, 29% Mid-Market


#### Pros & Cons

**Pros:**

- Code Management (1 reviews)
- Code Review (1 reviews)
- Collaboration (1 reviews)
- Review System (1 reviews)
- Tool Integration (1 reviews)

**Cons:**

- Complexity (1 reviews)
- Difficult Usability (1 reviews)
- Slow Speed (1 reviews)
- UX Improvement (1 reviews)

  ### 6. [Harness Platform](https://www.g2.com/products/harness-platform/reviews)
  Simplify your developer experience with the world's first AI-augmented software delivery platform. Upgrade your software delivery with Harness' innovative CI/CD, Feature Flags, Infrastructure as Code Management, and Chaos Engineering tools. We are a software delivery platform that helps developers and infrastructure engineers build and ship code for cloud and on-premise projects. We automate the continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) process to help teams build faster, ship more frequently, and improve quality, efficiency, and governance. We help companies in four key areas: Number one, we accelerate innovation through DevOps modernization. We provide an approach for software delivery that automates processes, reduces manual interventions, consolidates tools, and accelerates time-to-market for new products, features, and fixes. Number two, we improve developer experience. We give you the ability to attract, retain, and onboard high-caliber engineering talent while fostering a culture of continuous innovation and improvement. Number three, we secure software delivery. We give you the ability to integrate security into every phase of the SDLC. And last but not least is, we optimize cloud costs. We give you the ability to eliminate waste and to ensure that appropriate cloud resources are allocated at the right place at the right time.


  **Average Rating:** 4.6/5.0
  **Total Reviews:** 277

**User Satisfaction Scores:**

- **Quality of Support:** 9.0/10 (Category avg: 8.5/10)
- **Ease of Use:** 8.8/10 (Category avg: 8.8/10)


**Seller Details:**

- **Seller:** [Harness](https://www.g2.com/sellers/harness-25016f40-e80f-4417-bea8-39412055d17a)
- **Company Website:** https://harness.io/
- **Year Founded:** 2018
- **HQ Location:** San Francisco
- **Twitter:** @HarnessWealth (1,406 Twitter followers)
- **LinkedIn® Page:** https://www.linkedin.com/company/harnessinc/ (1,611 employees on LinkedIn®)

**Reviewer Demographics:**
  - **Who Uses This:** Software Engineer, DevOps Engineer
  - **Top Industries:** Computer Software, Financial Services
  - **Company Size:** 41% Enterprise, 39% Mid-Market


#### Pros & Cons

**Pros:**

- Ease of Use (113 reviews)
- Features (72 reviews)
- Feature Flags (49 reviews)
- Easy Setup (40 reviews)
- Easy Integrations (31 reviews)

**Cons:**

- Missing Features (23 reviews)
- Limitations (20 reviews)
- Limited Features (20 reviews)
- Learning Curve (17 reviews)
- Poor UI (16 reviews)

  ### 7. [Gerrit](https://www.g2.com/products/gerrit/reviews)
  Gerrit provides web based code review and repository management for the Git version control system.


  **Average Rating:** 4.3/5.0
  **Total Reviews:** 31

**User Satisfaction Scores:**

- **Quality of Support:** 7.1/10 (Category avg: 8.5/10)
- **Ease of Use:** 7.9/10 (Category avg: 8.8/10)


**Seller Details:**

- **Seller:** [Gitiles](https://www.g2.com/sellers/gitiles)
- **HQ Location:** N/A
- **Twitter:** @gerritreview (1,311 Twitter followers)
- **LinkedIn® Page:** https://www.linkedin.com/company/No-Linkedin-Presence-Added-Intentionally-By-DataOps (1 employees on LinkedIn®)

**Reviewer Demographics:**
  - **Who Uses This:** Senior Software Engineer
  - **Top Industries:** Computer Software, Information Technology and Services
  - **Company Size:** 50% Enterprise, 28% Mid-Market


#### Pros & Cons

**Pros:**

- Merging (2 reviews)
- Access Control (1 reviews)
- Branching Management (1 reviews)
- Code Review (1 reviews)
- Git Integration (1 reviews)

**Cons:**

- Complexity (1 reviews)
- Complex Setup (1 reviews)
- Difficult Learning (1 reviews)
- Integration Issues (1 reviews)
- Limited Integrations (1 reviews)



## Parent Category

[Source Code Management Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/source-code-management)



## Related Categories

- [Continuous Integration Tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/continuous-integration)
- [Version Control Hosting Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/version-control-hosting)
- [Secure Code Review Software](https://www.g2.com/categories/secure-code-review)



---

## Buyer Guide

### What You Should Know About Peer Code Review Software

### What is Peer Code Review Software?

Peer code review software facilitates a collaborative feedback and quality assurance process during software development. This software provides an organized means by which code can be examined, adjusted, and commented on by a developer other than the code’s author.

The code review process allows multiple developers to see changes to the code made by other developers, reducing the risk of bugs, security vulnerabilities, and missed requirements. Peer code review software also allows teams to check code for clarity and readability, which is an important aspect of programming. In a sense, the peer code review process facilitated by these tools is akin to the peer review processes used for writing projects. The fundamental value of these tools lies in the overall reduced possibility of human errors. However, these tools are also useful for onboarding newly hired developers. Developers with more experience on the team can review and comment on new developers’ code to instill team-specific best practices that aren’t necessarily universal. Even fully functional code can be improved by peer code review software. Team members can offer each other suggestions that result in better code, even if the original code is usable. Code review tools are used by software development teams in a project's development phase, which is cheaper, faster, easier, and more thorough than doing reviews during the requirements phase, testing phase, or after project delivery. By catching problematic code early, teams reduce the possibility of having to redo excess amounts of work.

Peer code review software allows developers to view not only code but also the specifics of what code was changed and to comment on those changes. These code review tools often integrate directly into other tools, including version control hosting solutions. This integration enables teams to smoothly incorporate the peer code review process into their standardized software development process.

### What are the Common Features of Peer Code Review Software?

The following are some core features within peer code review software that can help users facilitate a smooth and effective code review process:

**Commenting:** Code commenting is perhaps the most fundamental feature of peer code review software, as it allows developers other than a code’s author to provide feedback asynchronously. Developers reviewing someone else’s code can highlight relevant parts of the code to leave comments on. If multiple developers are reviewing the code in question, peer code review software allows them to group or chain comments from different developers pertaining to the same lines of code. Then, the code’s author can hover over the highlighted code to view those comments and adjust as necessary.

**Notifications:** Peer code review software uses notifications to alert relevant users as the code review process progresses. When the code’s author determines that their work is ready for review, the code review tool will notify their peer review partner or partners. Then, when the peer review is complete, the software will notify the original author so that they can adjust their code against the completed peer review. Teams can also set the granularity for these notifications. If desired, the code’s author can be alerted to each individual comment or change made by a peer reviewer. 

**Prioritization:** Most peer code review software allows reviewers to mark the severity of their comments. For example, if a peer reviewer finds an app-breaking error in the author’s code, they can both leave a comment and mark it as urgent or severe. This is usually accomplished via color coding or iconography such as an exclamation mark, drawing the author’s attention to the most important suggestions and corrections. Prioritization allows developers to delineate between minor preference differences and major flaws.

**Standardized best practices:** Most peer code review software allow teams to set and edit standardized best practices and metrics, which will be displayed prominently as a reference for peer reviewers to follow. Some peer code review software even automatically detect code that appears flawed and flags it for review, along with a description of the probable error. By making a team’s best practices and metrics more visible throughout the peer code review process, peer code review software reduces the possibility of human error and overlooked issues. 

### What are the Benefits of Peer Code Review Software?

The benefits of peer code review software are as mentioned below:

**Quality assurance:** Coding, like writing, produces complex and unique work depending on the author. While automated testing tools are important and useful in the software development process, a thorough and efficient peer code review process is vital to assuring code quality. Peer code review software helps team members evaluate each other’s work personally, which helps teams adhere to best practices and catch potential issues early. By validating code against other software developers’ judgment, code authors can better ensure their code’s readability and quality.

**Collaboration:** A peer code review process without the assistance of peer code review software is possible but tedious. Peer code review software facilitates easy and effective collaboration by structuring the peer code review process and notifying relevant users as the process progresses. Some peer code review software also help facilitate remote pair programming. Pair programming typically refers to a software development method involving two developers working on the same task together, with one programmer writing the code while the other makes comments and suggestions. With peer code review software, teams can engage with pair programming remotely by allowing disparate teammates to code and leave comments in real time.

**Efficiency:** In the software development world, it’s always better for issues to be caught early. When an issue goes unrecognized until the later stages of application development, it can result in a large amount of work needing to be redone. For example, if several elements of an application’s programming rely on the same foundational piece of code, and that code turns out to be flawed, then each of those elements is also flawed and may need to be reworked. Peer code review software helps ensure that problems are either addressed early or avoided entirely, which speeds up the development process and reduces headaches.

### Who Uses Peer Code Review Software?

The following personnel can make use of peer code review software:

**Senior developers:** Peer code review software allows senior developers to review junior developers’ work. This facilitates knowledge sharing and mentorship within the team while also ensuring quality by getting experienced developers’ eyes on the code.

**Junior developers:** Developers of all skill levels use peer code review software, and those developers with less experience benefit from the practice of reviewing their peers’ code. This enables them to better understand their team’s best practices and share the knowledge.

**Managers:** Managers on software development teams sometimes review code changes using peer code review software, though it tends to happen at an infrequent cadence. This ensures that managers are keeping an eye on their team’s code quality and offering mentorship where applicable.

#### Software Related to Peer Code Review Software

Related solutions that can be used together with peer code review software include:

[Secure code review software](https://www.g2.com/categories/secure-code-review) **:** Secure code review software enables either automated or manual code examination to seek out vulnerabilities and security risks. These solutions are similar to peer code review software, but they are specifically focused on ensuring security best practices as opposed to general coding best practices, and some solutions execute automated code remediation rather than enabling peer review. 

[Software testing tools](https://www.g2.com/categories/software-testing) **:** Software testing software gives development teams the methods and tools to determine the quality of their software creation and improvement projects. Development teams use software testing tools to assess whether the software is usable, performs properly, meets development team goals, and meets overall requirements. 

[Automation testing software](https://www.g2.com/categories/automation-testing) **:** Test automation software controls the execution of software tests. It simplifies the testing process for software engineers by using the minimum set of scripts, saving their teams time and money. These tools, typically utilized by large enterprises, allow teams to run pre-scripted tests on their applications before they are pushed into production.

[Bug tracking software](https://www.g2.com/categories/bug-tracking) **:** Bug tracking software, or issue tracking software, refers to software used by quality assurance (QA) and software development teams to report software bugs and problems. Bug tracking software provides a repository that explains how to reproduce a bug and how widespread an issue is, allowing a business to separate, prioritize, sequence, and provide communications about different bugs across many projects or applications.

### Challenges with Peer Code Review Software

Software solutions can come with their own set of challenges. 

**Effective notifications:** Companies should ensure that the peer code review software they’re interested in buying meets their requirements for effective notification. If the routes and methods that a peer code review tool uses to notify users of new comments don’t do enough to alert team members effectively, the entire process is slowed down. Notifications need to be clear, and developers should be able to click them once to jump right into the relevant section of the codebase. 

**Standardized peer review:** Standardizing the peer code review process helps companies ensure consistent code quality. With that in mind, companies should look for peer code review software that helps them standardize the process. An ideal solution should make best practices clear and remind users of important metrics so that each review is thorough and productive.

### Which Companies Should Buy Peer Code Review Software?

Any company with a software development team should use peer code review software, as it is a fundamental part of quality assurance and team collaboration.

### How to Buy Peer Code Review Software

#### Requirements Gathering (RFI/RFP) for Peer Code Review Software

G2.com can assist buyers in finding the best peer code review software, whether a buyer is searching for solutions for the first time or looking to replace legacy software.

Generally, the most important considerations are price, feature set, and integration with the company’s existing development workflow. One of the primary purposes of peer code review software is to make quality assurance more efficient and effective, so ensuring that the tool of choice fits seamlessly atop the company’s existing development environment is often essential. Using G2 reviews as a reference, buyers can determine the features that will best help them manage their peer code review process, ensuring a pain-free onboarding process and comprehensive solution. 

After narrowing down a potential pool of products, teams can then apply further considerations for budget, requirements, and more. Using this approach, buyers can confidently move forward in the buying process, referencing their checklist in conjunction with G2 scores to find the right solution for their needs.

#### Compare Peer Code Review Software Products

**Create a long list**

Buyers should consider the multiple peer code review solutions on the market. Some tools include automated remediation suggestions, which attempt to improve code even before another human developer gets their eyes on it. Others shine as real-time collaborative tools that facilitate pair programming. Buyers should consider options like these to produce a long list of potentially viable products.

**Create a short list**

Once a long list is created, buyers should employ a more granular approach to trim it down. Along with a matrix of must-have functionality and pricing, buyers can use G2 reviews to explore any potential advantages and disadvantages among the products they’re considering. With these factors in mind, buyers should narrow down their search to a list of three to five products.

**Conduct demos**

All software products on a company’s short list must be investigated firsthand via demos to ensure that real-time functionality matches on-paper expectations. During demos, buyers should make inquiries based on the requirements gathering they’ve done prior; for example, one might ask to be walked through a peer code review tool’s collaborative content management features to ensure the company’s needs will be met. 

#### Selection of Peer Code Review Software

**Choose a selection team**

Companies of any size should try to involve the most relevant personas when beginning the peer code review software selection process. Large companies might have the resources to include individual team members to fill roles such as team manager, decision maker, and senior developer. Smaller companies can overlap roles to compensate for their relatively fewer employees. 

**Negotiation**

Some vendors offer software solutions that can handle peer code review but do far more than what the buyer requires. While some vendors may only offer an all-or-nothing package, buyers who want to optimize spending should try to negotiate a fairly priced package, including only the functionalities that matter to them. For example, a product’s pricing page could show that the buyer’s must-have features are only included with an expensive all-in-one package, whereas a sales conversation may prove otherwise. 

**Final decision**

To conclude the process, performing a trial run with a small pool of developers is essential. This will aid buyers in ensuring that their chosen peer code review software is easy to use, integrates seamlessly with existing workflows, and facilitates highly effective collaboration. If the solution is received well and doesn’t slow down the development process, the buyer’s selection is probably the right one. If not, it may be time to try another product from the short list.