Network Management Tools Resources
Articles, Glossary Terms, Discussions, and Reports to expand your knowledge on Network Management Tools
Resource pages are designed to give you a cross-section of information we have on specific categories. You'll find articles from our experts, feature definitions, discussions from users like you, and reports from industry data.
Network Management Tools Articles
What Is Backhaul? How to Develop a Robust Network Backbone
WAN vs. LAN
Top 9 IoT Vulnerabilities to Enhance IoT Security in 2023
Network Topology Makes Network Management Easier
What Is a Network? Why It’s Important for Resource Sharing
Network Management Tools Glossary Terms
Network Management Tools Discussions
How do I upgrade ManageEngine OpManager?
I want to start a discussion with G2 experts on network management platforms, specifically, what platform supports multi-vendor device management most effectively? Many teams rely on broad vendor interoperability, so it’s no surprise that tools like Auvik, ManageEngine OpManager, and SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor often surface as strong contenders in this space.
Here are several platforms known for handling multi-vendor environments:
- Auvik - Automated discovery, config backups, multi-vendor visibility, and simple deployment.
- ManageEngine OpManager - Deep monitoring, topology mapping, and strong vendor profile library.
- SolarWinds - Mature multi-vendor support, NetPath, and advanced performance analytics.
- Paessler PRTG - Sensor-based monitoring with broad device compatibility and customizable probes.
- WhatsUp Gold - Flexible discovery, performance tracking, and strong SNMP-based interoperability.
- Zabbix - Open-source, highly customizable, and supports diverse vendor templates.
Which of these platforms has delivered the most reliable multi-vendor visibility and operational consistency in your environment?
A mix of tools tends to work best, platforms with broad SNMP/API support, strong autodiscovery, and stable config management usually provide the most consistent multi-vendor visibility. What integration or automation matters most in your setup?
I want to start a discussion with G2 experts on enterprise-grade network management tools. For teams running large, distributed, mission-critical environments, what truly stands out as the top tool for managing large enterprise networks? For context, here’s the relevant G2 Network Management Tools category page:
Below are 5 widely recognized tools for managing large enterprise networks:
- SolarWinds - Known for deep fault, performance, and flow analytics across complex infrastructures. How well does its scalability hold up in multi-site, high-device-density deployments?
- Cisco DNA Center - Strong in intent-based networking, automation, and SD-Access. How effectively does its AI-driven insights reduce manual troubleshooting in large networks?
- Auvik - Well regarded for automated topology mapping, configuration backup, and simplified visibility. Does its cloud-native design offer enough depth for very large enterprise environments?
- ManageEngine OpManager - Comprehensive monitoring with customizable dashboards and strong alerting. How does its performance evolve as monitoring requirements expand across hybrid ecosystems?
- PRTG Network Monitor - Popular for sensor-based monitoring, flexible scaling, and broad protocol support. Is sensor optimization manageable at true enterprise scale?
For those managing large enterprise networks, which capabilities, automation, observability depth, or scalability, have ultimately influenced your tool choice the most?
In large enterprises, choices usually hinge on automation that cuts manual work, observability that speeds root-cause analysis, and scalability for multi-site growth. Which area, cost efficiency or integration flexibility, matters most to you next?











